For now it is possible that Hutchison in 1938 developed his own original and consistent position. To the extent that the paper succeeds, it may help to resolve the inconsistency problem. Yet the two issues are closely connected and so the latter question is briefly discussed. That is, this paper deals with this specific question, rather than the wider one of whether or not Hutchison introduced Popperian falsificationism to economics. and Agassi failed to support their claim that Hutchison introduced Popper's criterion to economics. Previously I have criticized attempts to characterize Hutchison as a positivist or ultra-empiricist. Yet his apparent inconsistency in maintaining all of these positions seems to have gone unnoticed in the literature. Hutchison's 1938 essay has been variously interpreted as introducing positivism, ultra-empiricism and Popperian falsificationism to economics. Of the functor H to \Cal L and we describe the Auslander-Reiten quiver of \Cal Also, we determine the kernel of the restriction Our main interest lies in the inverse, it is given by the Yields a bijection between the indecomposables in the stable category of \Cal LĪnd those in mod kQ. Here we draw the attention to theĬase when A = k is the algebra of dual numbers, thus to the It seems to be worthwhile to consider also representations of Q overĪrbitrary finite-dimensional k-algebras A. The representations of a quiver Q over a field k have been studied for a long
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |